What is going to happen when many of the jobs are eliminated?
This is a question that is becoming of major concern. Many are awakening to the fact that the saying "technology always creates more jobs then it destroys" is not accurate. We could be faced with a future where massive numbers of jobs are lost.
The pace of automation is going to be stunning. We are looking at rapid advancement in AI. This is improving cognition in ways we never saw before. At the same time, we have the robotics industry moving from embryotic to more advanced. Naturally, there is still a long way to go but the idea of humanoids working in factories is not far-fetched.
How does society adapt to this? Where is the financial solution for people as the entire economy is upended?
As stated in the past, I think tokenization is the key. In this article we will discuss robots and how that could enhance the standing people have.

Image generated by Ideogram
The Tokenization of Robots
It is obvious that robots are units of labor. Based upon projections. each robot will provide greater than 1 economic output per human counterpart. This comes from a combination of more hours worked along with transferrable skills.
The point here is that 1 billion workers could be replaced by 1/3 or 1/2 the number of humanoid bots.
It does not take a genius to figure out this could be a major problem. Billions are dependent upon a paycheck for survival. If this disappears, we have catastrophic outcomes.
Tokenization is a solution. I recently wrote how the idea of having stake in robotaxis could be an example of income generation for individuals.
Let is go one step further and look at the tokenization of robots.
Fractional Ownership of Labor
We are going to see many different proposal offered up as we see unemployment numbers grow globally. These will be a variety of state (government) sponsored initiatives along with community-based ideas.
When we look at labor, we can start to question who owns the means of production. This was always the basis for the economic equation, with labor and capital (companies) fighting it out.
As robots enter the equation, the dispute ends. Capital wins and labor is out the door. Actually, this is the essence of the entire discussion.
Here is where tokenization enters.
What happens to the equation if the robots are not owned exclusively by the companies. In other words, a fraction of the means of production are directed towards other stakeholders.
For example, we could take a percentage of the robotic output and tokenize it. This could be set aside for individuals. There are many ways to structure this, either by direct investment on the personal level or through community or government intervention. It is an alternative to the "tax the robots".
The goal is to get tokenized assets in the hands of individuals. These could be a combination of appreciation and income distribution (yield). Individuals could own units in many different bots, helping to expanding the return while also mitigating risk.
The Exponential Growth In Value
One of the keys to this concept if that fact that robotics is going to follow the laws of information technology, at least to some degree. Since it operates in the world of atoms, the pace will be slower than IT. That said, we can see how, over time, costs will decline, at least on a per performance basis.
What this means is the robots 5 years from now will be able to output more while costing less money. That means the pie keeps getting larger, advancing at a pace far greater than humans set. It ultimately becomes an exponential.
The net result, whether the robots fractionalized on an individual or community basis, the productivity keeps increasing. One way of thinking about this is akin to a high growth fund. The output keeps growing, enhancing the stake that each person has.
All of this, I forecast, is leading to the economic singularity. We are likely to see a time of 30% annual growth in GDP. This is compared to the 3% average over the last 120 years.
Fractional ownership is going to really alter the distribution of value. Tokenization is one of the key under the new ownership model.
Posted Using INLEO
That’s refreshing because the real fun comes from reaching your personal goals and enjoying the game your own way.
I agree with you that the economic future needs out-of-the-box thinking and tokenization could be one of the key solutions.
Yes this the next step. But how to be sustainable in changing the way labour systems works is the big question..
Buy Tesla. Soon Cybercabs, Optimus robots
Machine replacing people in workplace is now the new order, and we're not yet In the 22nd century, if there would be any.
So what then happens if the companies choose to own this robots? Secondly, won't direct investment on this robot be for mostly 'accredited investors'. Does this create opportunity for the middle-class or shrink it?
Massive job losses.
Buy Tesla. Soon Cybercabs, Optimus robots
It could be controlled by corporations. That is why people need to support open source (entering robotics) and where some with means can purchase robots and tokenize them.
Certainly the government is a barrier to this since they will push that narrative.
This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.
Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating your Leo power to @india-leo account? We share 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.
100% of the rewards from this comment goes to the curator for their manual curation efforts. Please encourage the curator @bhattg by upvoting this comment and support the community by voting the posts made by @indiaunited.
While this is a big development, the human-capacity gap is expanding and the need to for more to get educated and prepare for the machine-future that is coming.
Robots would one day create spaces for massive production and whatever job vacuum there would be ceasing to exist, they will be replaced with new solution. We dont see blank systems existing in real life.
Technology will be controlled, just as the case of Uranium by-products.