Oh, hey. Lasse plagiarizing yet again from an AI chatbot without any attribution. Because he thinks his low effort should be rewarded by whales and there's no way that lazy ass looked at more than two web pages before his brain quota for the year was exhausted.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Oh, and I realized one more thing. Your editing and cleaning up of your post to make it obvious which text is yours and which was AI-generated has actually made things worse. Even if you hadn’t tried to give the impression that you were transparent about the AI-generated content from the start—and had been clear when you originally posted—you still should have set your post to decline payment.
By cleaning up the post, it's now obvious that your so-called “debate” was just you giving short prompts while the chatbot wrote the vast majority of your content.
So now, while your post might no longer meet your alma mater’s definition of plagiarism under its guidelines, it does run afoul of @hivewatchers.
Keep that in mind the next time you whine in an open letter to the Hive whales about how your low-effort content isn’t being rewarded.
You didn't make it clear what text was yours and what text was Grok's within your post. You edited the attribution in after I pointed out your plagiarism and then, as usual, were intellectually dishonest pretending like you hadn't plagiarized.
If you really believed that what you did wasn't plagiarism then you wouldn't have edited your post cleaning it up and you wouldn't be pretending like you had attributed the text the whole time.
According to the guidelines of the university that gave you a Masters degree that's plagiarism. If as a lazy ass idiot you have a problem with not doing proper attribution being considered plagiarism take it up with your alma mater.