In this regard, a booklet (On Bullshit, 2005) written by American philosopher Harry Frankpert (Princeton University, Moral Philosophy) on the theme of 'dog sound' comes to mind. "A dog sound that makes intentionally deceptive inaccurate statements is more dangerous than a lie," Frankpert said. "Telling a dog includes bluffing." This is exactly what the court in Yoon Suk Yeol looks like at this time (Harry Frankpert, About Dog Sound, pp. 2023, 49).
About 20-30% of the criminal suspects, who have been caught wielding violence, insist that they "have no recollection of what I have done." It is a so-called memory disorder. In the case of Yoon Suk Yeol, it does not seem to be a memory disorder. Looking at the 'moon shadow falling on the lake', what psychiatrists call 'delusional disorder' seems more correct. Otherwise, many citizens cannot say "nothing has happened" even after causing a disturbance in their sleep.
Israel Chani (Hibry University, Psychology) is the director of the 'Holocaust and Genocide Research Institute' in Jerusalem, which deals with the field of Genocide (genocide). He interpreted the phrase 'nothing happened' as a 'typical denial' much more basic than 'never happened'. 'There is nothing to say if nothing happened.' Those who deny the Nazi massacre argue that 'it never happened'. According to Channi, even they don't insist that 'nothing happened'. Let's listen to him.
[We humans often deny the harm we have actually done in our daily lives. Infants and children deny the behavior even after shedding milk, breaking toys or stealing candy. Adults deny that money is missing, that valuables are missing in the house, and that reason was sitting with them in the car. Denying lies and telling lies is a useful tool when most of us live our lives] (Israel Chani, , Zen, 2024, p. 243).
The examples mentioned above are occasional events in daily life. However, the situation is different when it comes to civil war or war crimes. Citing the Holocaust of △Nazi, ethnic cleansing of Armenians in Turkey in the early 20th century, and the Japanese military's atrocities of △ forcing Korean women to live in sexual slavery, Chani criticizes that denying such heinous war crimes is "not only an attempt to maliciously and dishonestly rewrite human history, but also an attack on the future of mankind."
Not a few people deny the Holocaust, saying that it never happened. In June 2024, Ursula Harperbeck, a 95-year-old grandmother, stood in the defendant's seat at the Hamburg District Court in Germany. It was not about Nazi-era crimes, but about Holocaust denial. Harperbeck has been in court several times and served two years in prison since 2018. He also had a history of running in prison as a candidate for the far-right party "Die Rechte" in the 2019 European Parliament elections.
In court, HarperCorp raised his voice, saying, "The Holocaust is the longest-running lie in history," and "Auschwitz was a labor camp, not a death camp." The court said, "The accused experienced the Nazis as a child and could live to the age of 95. However, the victims of the Nazi massacre did not," and sentenced him to one year and four months in prison (he died in November 2024). There are not a few people in Western society who think the same as HarperBeck. They just don't stand out because they are afraid of punishment.
One last thing to think about is the real problem of rationalizing one's actions or making profit by using the Holocaust. Jews who commit war crimes in Palestine often say, "We sacrificed a lot to Hitler." In doing so, they claim the Holocaust as an indulgence. Jewish organizations and lawyers pocketed a large sum of money in the process of compensation. Another problem is that "fake Holocaust survivors" are rampant. Critics point out that the Holocaust has already turned into an indulgence or money-making process for Jews. It is the so-called holocaust industry. I will take a critical look at it next week. (Continued)
He denies what he's done and wants to have his own legitimacy
It's an article that says it's one of the most common actions.
He doesn't seem to have such a high-level idea in the first place,
I think they are low-quality people who just try to escape the difficulties in front of them.
What they both have in common is that they make selective factual citations or distortions as a basis while denying.
They want to use it as a shield by winning the consent of their supporters
The judiciary punished them through objective facts and stuffed them into history
We must punish them strictly so that similar groups do not arise again.
To that end, the first step is to bring down its supporters politically
Strict punishment will be easier.
I hope they will be punished by voting.