I tend not to watch atrocities. I have enough evil in my head already, and I prefer to consider good things, so that I express what is good. It is bad enough I have to be aware of atrocities so I can maintain a true understanding of the conditions we live in. I say this because I didn't spend much time watching the video of the Christchurch massacre, and didn't analyze it carefully for the stated reasons.
IMG source - Upload.Wikimedia.org - Al Noor Mosque
That turns out to have been a mistake, as I was availed only the same false impression of the event that was intended by it's creators. Greg Reese publishes the Reese Report, seeking to uncover information about events being used to manipulate us, and in this report he has discovered a doozy: the Christchurch massacre was staged.
After watching the linked report, I am left almost shocked that this wasn't reported immediately. The censoring of the video probably contributed to that lapse, reducing the number of people that carefully analyzed it. Even so, some of the points the forensic analyst makes leave a sense that this should never have passed the bar, because they are so obvious. I have to note that times have changed, and today we are jaded, having been so often manipulated with staged events we almost automatically assume they are staged now, and it takes a much higher standard of evidence before we can swallow the stories we're told.
Anyway, I provide the above link so that my readers will be informed about this analysis, and I have not seen it anywhere else. That suggests to me that many of the alt media sources we are provided today aren't free to report on whatever they want, aren't actual free speech, but follow an agenda because they are controlled opposition. I realized this some time ago about Luke Rudkowski, Tim Poole, and others like Alex Jones that seek to limit our grasp of our circumstances by publishing limited hangouts.
Seek the whole truth, that you may be wholly free.
The interesting thing about this particular event is the reports of a C-130 coming in the day before, and leaving right after.
They don't see that kind of plane down there. And several people reported it.
LightOnConspiracy did an excellent report on this. At minimum, the lone gunman was complete bollix.
The hurdle that people must surmount to grasp that an event is a staged psyop requires them to be so certain of the evidence proving it that they accept their entire lives are a lie. It is almost impossible for some people to even do that. The people that do manage it do so against such powerful opposition that for many it becomes a geas. Understanding the fact we live under a global terrorist mafia is the prerequisite to doing something about it, so we attempt to provide extraordinary proof that can enable more good people to grasp our true circumstances.
Eventually such body of evidence compels them capable of understanding to accede to some fact or other, but that only begins their journey towards understanding, and doesn't mean they just accept claims of psyops without extraordinary proof. It has taken these years for this extraordinary proof to become available to me, and I have been aware of the corruption of government my entire adult life.
Thanks!
Just leaving this as I canot say much on this topic, sadly.
Yes. I understand. I briefly touch on this in the OP, and suspect it is one of the reasons the psyop wasn't widely understood early as staged. It has been a transformative event for NZ, that ended much of the civil liberties Kiwis enjoyed, and your comment exemplifies why.
Thanks!